California Solar Project

News

September 01, 2010

  • Re-hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    solar incentive grades blue state red state Re hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    Check out the chart above. It is the same solar incentive report card we produced in part 4 of our 2010 report on the state of residential solar across the country, albeit with one difference. Yeah, blue and red states. My main impulse was not to rustle a regional divide between people in our country, yet instead to highlight differences in legislative policy and priorities.

    obama communist Re hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    I think it’s funny that more and more blowhards are tooting the “cut government spending” horn and pointing fingers at states that have relatively strong solar policies as prime targets of ill-advised socialist expenditures and “earmarks”. After all, the more these people toot, the more they are amplified by the mainstream media. That’s mainly because of a few billionaires with monetary interests aligned with force feeding political opinion into your eyes and ears.

    I was curious to understand why so many red states lag so far behind in our report and started doing some more research this morning. I figured it can’t be just because of strong oil, gas, and coal lobbies. Could it? I found a ranking of federal dollars spent per dollar of taxes received in each state, and that raised my eyebrows. Here’s a great graphic which illustrates where dollars flow from and to Harvard guy (I marked the chart up to more clearly show the red and blue states):

    federal spending blue red Re hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    If you affiliate yourself with Republican conservatives, you might be surprised to see a strong statistical relationship, but that the direction is the opposite from what you would expect: The red states (those that vote Republican) generally receive more subsidies from the federal government than they pay in taxes; in other words they are further to the right in the graph. It’s the other way around with the blue states (those that vote Democratic).

    The big outlier in the graph is New Mexico, though they have several expensive air force bases and top secret stuff located in the state. I was interested to see the major sources of redistributed wealth are New Jersey, Nevada, Connecticut, Illinois, Delaware, California, New York, and Colorado. Those same states score very well in our solar incentive report above.

    This trend in wealth redistribution in the form of subsidies is not a new one, here’s the trend from 1981-2005 which I just compiled from the Tax Foundation’s data:

    fed expenditures Re hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    The closer you get to being ranked #50, the lower the percentage of federal taxes that come from your state which actually gets spent in your state. Who is ranked #50? Well, here’s New Jersey, the state with arguably the best solar incentives in the country:
    new jersey fed expenditures Re hashing the 2010 Solar Incentive Report Card: Blue States and Red States

    So, not only do the tax dollars in New Jersey flow mainly to Republican states which fare very poorly in our report solar report card, but New Jersey also manages to have the best solar incentives in the country. While those incentives start with a strong renewable portfolio standard instead of tax dollars, it is intriguing to note how money flows through country, and where progressive solar legislation gets enacted.

    Perhaps it is not surprising why Glenn Beck was urging his followers to boycott the census. Maybe he didn’t want people to find out their state coffers have been (and continue to be) lined with Democrat dollars for decades.

    - 2 days
    source: (Solar Power Rocks)

August 31, 2010

August 28, 2010

August 27, 2010

More news with summaries